Still, a sense that neocons and foreign-policy elites were winning seemed to permeate the room. Donald Trump’s greatest foreign-policy triumph was not so much any of his decisions, but rather that he “broke the neocon Republican orthodoxy,” Dan Bishop, a second-term representative from North Carolina, told the crowd. Vance, who mocked the intelligence of Bill Kristol, the neoconservative pundit and Never Trumper. Perhaps the biggest applause line of the entire conference was delivered by the Ohio Senate candidate J.
Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was the target of repeated scorn. Time and time again, speakers mocked foreign-policy hawks and criticized Republicans who had supported the Iraq War. The most common object of the attendees’ ire was not the Democrats, but instead the traditional enemy of the isolationist right, neoconservatives. Saagar Enjeti, a conservative pundit and podcaster, went so far as to say that Biden’s “79-year-old ailing heart may be the only thing standing in between us and World War III.” President Joe Biden, though, received some praise for his comparatively restrained response to the crisis. In fact, Cruz was the target of a jab onstage from a fellow Republican senator, Rand Paul, who suggested that the Texan’s advocacy for sanctions on Russian energy was simply intended to boost the bottom line of the energy industry in his home state. “And people have their own isms that they bring to the table.” The result was a conference of the right where Tulsi Gabbard was invited but figures such as Ted Cruz were absent. There is a specific policy outcome motivating the type of factions we brought here today, which is that we don’t want another war,” Sharma said. The broad consensus: Putin is bad, but why is that our problem? Putin is bad, but why should we trust the American foreign-policy establishment? Putin is bad, but the media is in thrall to the U.S. Instead, the phrase of the day seemed to be “Putin is bad, but …” The attendees, who included paleocons, libertarians, and hard-core MAGA acolytes, offered variations on that tune according to their policy preferences: Putin is bad, but we don’t want a nuclear war. The event wasn’t a Putin apologia like those found in some corners of the right. “We were acutely worried that the seven years of foreign-policy gains that we made were going to go away,” Saurabh Sharma, one of the conference’s organizers, told me. The organizers were The American Conservative, the paleoconservative publication founded by Pat Buchanan and American Moment, a newer organization that tries to sell the next generation of the right on its version of national conservatism. The conference, Up From Chaos, was a summit of all the wings of the right that would prefer a more hands-off American response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. professionals and college students leavened with a handful of older cranks, the hawkish response to Russian aggression by most elected Republicans was the real problem.
But Vladimir Putin’s war of aggression wasn’t what confounded them most for these conservatives, a mix of D.C. They had all been traumatized by the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which had left them questioning their assumptions about the world. Prigozhin has complained his troops lack basic supplies, especially ammunition, and that could be a result of "ordinary bureaucracy or a betrayal".On Thursday, in a dim conference room in the bowels of a Washington, D.C., hotel, about 150 conservatives gathered for a day of group therapy. Putin's billionaire pal warns 'Russia will be broke by 2024' and must 'stop dreaming'Īnd the ISW said that Russia's leadership "is likely seizing the opportunity to deliberately expend both elite and convict Wagner forces in Bakhmut in an effort to weaken Prigozhin and derail his ambitions for greater influence in the Kremlin.".Prigozhin’s Wagner Group fighters could launch a civil war within Russia, some experts predict (Image: AP) Read More Related Articles
0 kommentar(er)
